Week Three: 15th – 22nd October

Day 15
Reading:  Miller, E. (2001). Indeterminacy as interview research co-constructing ambiguity and clarity in interviews with an adult immigrant learner of English.  Applied Linguistics. 32:1, pg. 43 – 59

Day 16
Reading:  Cadman, K., and Brown, J. (2011). TESOL and TESD in Remote Aboriginal Australia: The “True” Story?. TESOL Quarterly, 45:3, pp. 440 – 462.

Day 17 – OFF (Happy Birthday to me)

Day 18 (catch up day)
Reading:  Edwards, J. (2009). Chapter 3: Identifying Ourselves. In Language and Identity. CUP, pg. 34 – 52.

The content of this chapter wasn’t quite what I had expected.  I was expecting something related to the psychology of individual identity formation.  This was very very different. It was more a discussion on how academic endeavours have historically misrepresented the groups under study through viewing them with an ethnocentric-outsider lens.  There is a discussion on the implication of names in creating a group identity with relevance to how individuals are seen, accepted or rejected (generally speaking).

Day 19
Reading:  Holliday, A. (2011). Chapter 1: Key Discussions. In Intercultural Communication and Ideology. Sage: London, pg. 1 – 17.

Day 20
Reading:  Holliday, A. (2011). Chapter 2: Critical Cultural Awareness. In Intercultural Communication and Ideology. Sage: London, pg. 18 – 22 (part 1).

Day 21
Reading:  Holliday, A. (2011). Chapter 2: Critical Cultural Awareness. In Intercultural Communication and Ideology. Sage: London, pg. 18 – 22 (part 2).

Ok so I cheated the last two days!  It has been a little hectic so rather than speed read and have everything wash over me I decided to divide this particularly dense chapter into two readings – which was a very good idea.

Day 22 (Day off)

Day 23
Reading: Sikes, P. (2000).  ’Truth’ and ‘Lies’ Revisited.  British Educational Research Journal. 26:2, pg. 257 – 270.

End of week reflection:  This was a particularly hard week of trying to read effectively and not for the sake of it.  I missed out on a day, which, in retrospect, was good because I felt that whatever I read that day would have had the cursory skim through and I would be very, VERY, *VEEERY* tempted to post this up and pretend I actually read it.  I didn’t want to go down that route.  So I didn’t.  

Please leave a reply!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s